Watford logo Watford

Comments (15)

 
  • Saar had 2 dribbles, 1 shot, 1 aerial and 1 tackle won. How can his rating be only 5.9 ?

  • @neumi17 the rating system should be changed to be more relatif to the facts.

  • @neumi17 also dispossessed four times, shot off target, lost an aerial duel, dribbled past twice, offside three times and committed a foul

  • @WilliePete Well, shot off target is normal as well as committing a foul. I just know when Messi or Neymar ein 1 dribble or have 1 shot somewhere the rating goes up 0.3 each time. If you calculate all the good and bad things of Saar together, he shouldn't end up with a worse rating than to begin with.

  • @neumi17 he was also on a side that lost 4-0

  • @WilliePete exactly . realy it's not fair. see what Foster has done to stop the catastroph. he should be MOTM.

  • @sampo It also takes into account the position of where these things have happened, if the shot is speculative it's not worth as much, if he was dispossessed or misplaced a pass in a dangerous area that will drag his score down more. The ratings are indicative only and it's usually better just to watch the game and decide for yourself if a player played well or not :)

  • Hopefully Villa wins and Watford go down

  • Too EA$Y! How do books stay in business?

  • 0-3

  • Watford have too poor defence to even stop useless titi-sraka Man City tactics = pass max for 3 metres long or cross to midgets attackers. Still 1-1 possible

  • @koziol.mutant you need help

  • It's EPL relegation battle, crazy things happen. I think, Man City can score against a smaller team who dare to play an attacking football. Cause, if Watford go for an attacking football, there will be so many space to exploit, Man City will score at least 3 goals or more. And I don't think Watford can score more than 1 goal. So, it's 3-1 or more for Man City.

  • Sarr to do what he did to Liverpool.. 2-0.